Banned Books Week: Why the Debate Matters
Banned Books Week is an annual event observed in libraries, some schools, and bookstores across the United States. It may feel like we hear about banned books often now, but the event was established in 1982. Then, the American Library Association aimed to draw attention to the increasing number of challenges to books / reading materials. The week is intended to raise awareness of these challenges and to promote public discussion about who decides what is appropriate for different readers.
The event does not necessarily promote or condemn specific books. Instead, it highlights that book challenges and removals are happening more frequently. Furthermore, it encourages communities to consider how decisions about reading materials are made in schools and libraries.
Why Some People Support Book Bans
Supporters of restricting or removing certain books often cite concerns about age-appropriateness, explicit content, or moral values. They may argue that some materials contain graphic violence, sexual content, profanity, or themes they feel are not suitable for children or teens.
Parents in some districts have challenged The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison. They believe the book’s depiction of sexual violence is not suitable for students. Others have raised concerns about Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe. They say its detailed discussion of gender identity and sexuality is not age-appropriate. Supporters of removing these books emphasize their right to guide their children’s reading. They want control over what materials their children encounter in school.
They may see book restrictions not as censorship, but as a form of parental involvement and responsibility—ensuring that content aligns with family or community standards. For some, it’s a question of protecting childhood innocence and preserving the values they wish to pass on at home.
Why Others Oppose Book Bans
Those who oppose book bans typically argue that removing books limits intellectual freedom and suppresses diverse perspectives. They believe students should have access to a wide range of ideas, even those that may be challenging, uncomfortable, or controversial.
Librarians, educators, and free-speech advocates often stress that the right to read is fundamental to a democratic society. They contend that books can serve as tools for empathy, critical thinking, and understanding of different lived experiences.
Some schools have challenged To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. Critics say its portrayal of racism and language can be upsetting for students. The Hate U Give by Angie Thomas has also faced challenges. It includes difficult themes about racism and law enforcement. Many educators defend these books as tools for learning and empathy. They believe such stories help students discuss real social and historical issues. Books with LGBTQ+ characters, like And Tango Makes Three, also face debate. Some view these stories as promoting inclusion, while others question their place in schools.
Finding Common Ground
At its core, the debate over banned books is about who gets to decide what is appropriate and how to balance community values with the right to information. Both sides share a concern for children’s development and learning—they simply approach it from different perspectives.
Banned Books Week invites everyone to engage thoughtfully in that conversation—to listen, question, and consider how access to literature shapes both individuals and society. Whether one supports restrictions or opposes them, the discussion itself underscores the ongoing importance of education, dialogue, and the written word.
Your Classroom?
Parents of course know what is best for their children, while active community members make awesome teachers. If that sounds like you, pursue your teacher certification today, quickly and affordably with American Board. Visit www.AmericanBoard.org to learn more.
